Skip to main content

nUSA Legal

Supreme Court Board Volume 2

JedBartlett v. Federal Elections Commission

A motion by the FEC is only bias if it is prejudicial or non-uniform.

TYPE:

CIVIL

DOCKET #

38HT1

CITATION

2. US. 1 (2016)

United States v. Las Vegas

The Tow Truck Service is under the jurisdiction of the City.

TYPE:

CIVIL

DOCKET #

38G17

CITATION

2. US. 4 (2016)

HHPrinceGeorge v. Capitalized

House of Representatives cannot ordain resolutions that are unconstitutional.

TYPE:

CIVIL

DOCKET #

1-10

CITATION

2. US. 8 (2016)

Qolio v. United States

Regulating speech based on content is unconstitutional and other 1st Amend. issues.

TYPE:

CIVIL

DOCKET #

2-3

CITATION

2. US. 11 (2016)

CodyGamer100 v. United States

A plea entered under a joinder is not representative of all those charged under the joinder.

TYPE:

CRIMINAL

DOCKET #

2-4

CITATION

2. US. 18 (2016)

United States v. Las Vegas

The Las Vegas City Council could not legislate ordinances under the previous Constitution.

TYPE:

CIVIL

DOCKET #

2-5

CITATION

2. US. 24 (2016)

Ryan_Revan v. United States

Congress cannot delegate an unconstitutional amount of authority to the Municipality[ies].

TYPE:

CIVIL

DOCKET #

2-7

CITATION

2. US. 34 (2016)

Bob561 v. Mindy_Lahiri

A hearing is not required for Contempt of Court (18 U.S.C. 401) and other COC issues.

TYPE:

CIVIL

DOCKET #

2-9

CITATION

2. US. 44 (2016)

DonaldJTrump v. United States

No Court may act without a "case or controversy" nor issue orders without due process applied.

TYPE:

CIVIL

DOCKET #

2-10

CITATION

2. US. 57 (2016)

Likeanub v. United States

A trial in absentia may only occur with notice and other due process rights.

TYPE:

CRIMINAL

DOCKET #

2-11

CITATION

2. US. 60 (2016)

Zeyad567ALT v. SteffJonez

A Judge may not issue contempt for intra legem issues and other COC issues.

TYPE:

CIVIL

DOCKET #

2-12

CITATION

2. US. 70 (2016)

Sudden v. Helleoh

Reaffirming George v. Capitalized, 2 U.S. 8 (2016).

TYPE:

CIVIL

DOCKET #

2-16

CITATION

2. US. 86 (2016)

AdamStratton v. Technozo

Nomination and approval of Respondent is unconstitutional and violates the Ineligiblity Clause of Article 1.

TYPE:

CIVIL

DOCKET #

2-17

CITATION

2. US. 88 (2016)